Summary

A variety of controversies should be considered by an implant team before recommending cochlear implants in children, adolescents, or even adults who are congenitally deaf. These factors include, but are not limited to, minimum and maximum age for implantation, extent and quality of hearing aid, listening and speaking experience, family financial and emotional support, communication mode in the family and in the educational programs available, role of deaf culture in the family and child's life, the child's own perceptions and ability to participate in the implant decision, advisability of implantation in children with multiple disabilities, extent of outcome data studies, and implications of neural plasticity and cortical reorganization studies.

All these controversies serve to remind the members of the implant team how carefully each family and child must be evaluated and how sensitive the counseling and explanation process must be before the decision to implant is made.

REFERENCES

Kretschmer—CHAPTER 81

1. Parkins CW. Compensating for hair cell loss with cochlear implants. In: Berlin CI, editor. Neurotransmission and Hearing Loss: Basic Science, Diagnosis, and Management. San Diego: Singular; 1997:107-135

2. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL. Cochlear implants in children younger than two years. Am J Otol 1998;19:158-162

3. Brackett D, Zara CV. Communication outcomes related to early implantation. Am J Otol 1998;19:453-460

4. National Institutes of Health. NIH Consensus Statement: Early Identification of Hearing Impairment in Infants and Young Children. Washington, DC: US Public Health Service; 1993

5. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. 1994 position statement. Pediatrics 1995;95:152-156

6. Yoshinaga-Itano C. Efficacy of early identification and early intervention. Semin Hear 1995;16:115-123

7. Geers A. Comparing implants with hearing aids in profoundly deaf children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117:180-187

8. Snik AF, Makhdoum MJ, Vermeulen AM, et al. The relationship of age at the time of cochlear implantation and long-term speech perception abilities in congenitally deaf subjects. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1997;41:121-131

9. Rose DM, Vernon M, Pool AF. Cochlear implant in prelin-gually deaf children. Am Ann Deaf 1996;141:258-262

10. Boothroyd-Turner D, Boothroyd A. The characteristics and attainment of 8 children who are congenitally deaf and who use cochlear implants. Presented at the Alexander Graham Bell Association Conference, Little Rock, AR; 1998

11. Luetje CM, Jackson K. Cochlear implants in children: what constitutes a complication? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:243-247

12. Lane H. The mask of benevolence. New York: Alfred Knopf; 1992

13. Cohen NL. The ethics of cochlear implants in young children. Am J Otol 1994;15:1-2

14. Balkany T, Hodges AV, Goodman KW. Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;114:748-755

15. Fabry LB. Identification and management of auditory neuropathy. Presented at Phonak International Conference.

A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification, Chicago, IL; 1998

16. Osberger MJ, Fisher L, Zimmerman-Phillips S, et al. Speech recognition performance of older children with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1998;19:152-157

17. Tyler RS, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay DM, et al. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:180-187

18. Robbins A, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing impaired children. Am J Otol 1991;12(suppl):144-150

19. Webster DB. Effects of neonatal sound deprivation in animal research. Semin Speech Lang Hear 1982;3:336-343

20. Naito Y, Hirano S, Honjo I, et al. Sound induced activation of auditory cortices in cochlear implant users with post- and pre-lingual deafness demonstrated by positron emission tomography. Acta Otolaryngol 1997;117:490-496

21. Shepherd RK, Hartmann R, Heid S, et al. The central auditory system and auditory deprivation: experiences with cochlear implants in congenitally deaf children. Acta Otolaryngol 532(suppl):28-33

22. Willott JF. Physiological plasticity in the auditory system and its possible relevance to hearing aid use, deprivation effects, and acclimitization. Ear Hear 1996;17:665-775

0 0

Post a comment